 |
AGRICULTURE AND IRRIGATION
|
 |
TENANCY AND TENURES
Prior to 1949, there existed in Bhir district different categories
of tenures, such as jagirs, ijaras, kauls, inams etc. Their
creation was felt essential by the previous rulers for political,
administrative and religious purposes. The then rulers required
support to their rule and sure source of revenue to the state.
They picked up some leading men in the society, who could
influence the masses and gave them inams with the power to collect
the revenue of the entire villages, or a definite percentage of
the collected land revenue. These persons, later on, came to be
known as watandars, inamdars, jagirdars, deshmukhs, deshpandes
etc. They were expected to give their full support to the rulers
to maintain law and order and to ensure regular and punctual
payment of government dues after recovering the same from the
people. This resulted in the creation of a class of landlords, who
did not cultivate their lands, but lived on the revenues realised
from their inams, jagirs and kauls. The British regime, obviously,
did not want to displease these people. They recognised their
rights and privileges just to ensure their loyalty and to secure
their support to the British rule. However, it was realised later
that this system of tenure was detrimental to the interests ot the
cultivating classes.
The most prevalent form of tenure in Bhir district is the ryotwari
tenure. Strictly speaking, this type of tenure does not envisage
the landholder as a non-cultivating owner and a mere rent
receiver. Due to unrestricted transfers of rights in land and
other factors, such as security of investment in land and false
notions of social prestige on the part of the people, a class of
non-agriculturists landlords came into existence. Landed property
began to be looked upon as a source of income and a matter of
commercial investments. Besides this, ownership of land afforded
these people an eminent place and high prestige in the society.
The achievement of Independence changed the political picture of
India. The much-felt need of bringing an over-all change in the
socio-economic picture also began to be widely realised.
Consequent to this, the Government of India appointed a Planning
Commission, which made a number of recommendations for bringing
about the structural, institutional and administrative reforms in
different sectors. They advocated a land policy, which aimed at
improving the status of the peasant by giving him a stake in land.
It also aims at reducing inequalities in income and opportunities,
by advocating a ceiling on all agricultural holdings. It
visualises an agrarian economy in which every cultivator owns the
land he cultivates.
In view of the policy recommended by the Planning Commission the
Government of India decided to abolish all the intermediaries by
enacting special land legislations. In pursuance of the Government
of India's directives, the then Government of Hyderabad enacted
the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act [The Act was
enforced in Bhir district w.e.f. 10-6-1950.], 1950. The twin aims
of the Act are assurance of security of tenures for the tenants
and promoting the proprietary rights of the peasants. The salient
features of the Act were: —
(i) Introduction of family holdings as a yardstick for the
administration of land reforms,
(ii) Reduction in rent and fixation of it in terms of multiples of
land revenue,
(iii) Restriction on resumptions of the land for personal
cultivation,
(iv) Fixation of ceiling on the size of holding,
(v) Acquisition or resumption and management by the state of the
surplus production in efficiently cultivated lands.
The relations between tenant and landlord are governed by the
Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. Initially.
these relations were tried to be regularised by the enforcement of
the Hyderabad Asami Shikmi Act of 1354 Fasli (1945 A. D.) which
provided for fixing the tenure of all new tenants for ten years
and empowered the government to fix maximum rates of rent.
Further, old tenants were granted permanency of tenure subject to
the payment of lawful rent only. However, the provisions of this
act did not achieve the desired object. As such a more
revolutionary type of legislation viz. the Tenancy Act of 1950,
was enacted, to replace the Asami Shikmi Act. The main objects of
this act were the improvement of the status of the tenants,
limitation of size of holding, abolition of absentee landlordism
and preservation of the land in the hands of the tillers and the
genuine agriculturists. According to the new enactment of 1950,
the landlords are restrained from retaining land which is more
than 4½ times the size of the family holding and acquiring new
land.
If their holdings exceed three family holdings, the protected
tenants, who are landless or have held small lands were given
privileges to acquire compulsorily the rights of ownership of the
tenancy land to the extent of one family holding belonging to a
landholder, who owns more than two family holdings under Section
38-E of the Act. The tenants in general are allowed to purchase
land under their tenancy under Section 38-A on reasonable price
within the maximum limits prescribed by the government. Similarly,
the landlords are required to sell their land to the tenants with
first preference, under Section 38-D of the Act. The absentee
landlords are not allowed to resume the cultivation of lands after
31-12-1958, thus ensuring fixing of tenure of cultivation and
possession of lands in favour of tenants as long as they cultivate
the lands without damaging them and without subletting or
committing continuous default in payment of rent. The rents have
also been fixed up to a maximum of five times of the revenue
assessment under Section 11 of the Act. The Government has also
powers to assume management of the lands kept uncultivated except
on reasonable grounds for more than three years under Section 51
of the Act.
All the provisions operate in the best interests of the tenants
and tend to regularise the relation between them and their
landlords. In these circumstances, the law does equal justice to
both-
The maximum, rents have been prescribed in the Act for the
protected and ordinary tenants. If the amount of rent payable by
the tenant for any type of land exceeds the value of one sixth of
its produce, the tenants shall be entitled to deduct from the rent
for that land the amount so in excess and the quantum payable by
the tenant shall be deemed to have been reduced by the extent of
such deduction. Moreover, the tenant has option to pay the rent
either in cash or in equivalent produce of grain, according to the
prices prevailing in the market. The landlords are prohibited from
receiving or recovering rent in terms of services. They cannot
levy taxes or accept services of any kind other than the rent
lawfully due from the tenants. The protected tenant, subject to
certain conditions, is defined as a person who has held the land
continuously for a period of not less than six years, being a
period fully included in the Fasli years 1342 to 1352 or for a
period of not less than six years immediately preceding the first
day of January 1948 or for the period of not less than six years,
commencing not earlier than 6.10.1943, and completing before
enforcing the tenancy act and who has personally cultivated such
lands during that period.
The act strictly lays down that no permanent alienation and no
other transfer of the lands shall be valid unless it is made with
the previous sanction of the collector. Not only restriction is
placed on the future acquisition of land, but a ceiling is also
fixed for the existing landholdings.
During the period of ten years, from 1950 to 1960, the act was
amended twelve times just to accommodate the recommendations of
the Planning Commission. As has been pointed out, it adopted the
concept of family holding as a yard-stick for enforcing the
provisions of ceiling of landholdings act. The area of a family
holding so determined for different classes of land in different
local areas was expected to yield an assured income of Rs. 800 per
year to a family of five members. The tenant cannot be evicted at
the sweet will of the landholder. He can be evicted only under
certain specific categories of default or due to his own voluntary
surrender.
In Bhir district there were 20,242 protected tenants in 1950 who
cultivated a little or more than 2,82,437 acres. The number of
declared owners under sections 37 and 37-A is 26,166 covering an
area of 4,76,021 acres. The number of protected tenants on whom
ownership rights under section 38-E of the Act has been conferred
is 5,772 involving an area of 65,704 acres. The number of tenants
who are allowed to purchase lands under their tenancy, under
section 38 A is 91 involving an area of 1406 acres. The declared
owners who were dispossessed are being given back possession of
the declared lands and so far the number of such protected tenants
is 891 involving an area of 7,226 acres.
In the same years, 5,772 tenants were declared as owners under
section 38-E of the Act. They cultivated an area of over 65,704
acres.
From 1950 to 1960, 19,066 cases were filed under the Tenancy Act.
Out of these, 17,324 cases were disposed of and 1,742 remained
undecided. Of the cases disposed 11,931 were decided in favour of
tenants and 5,221 cases against him.
The tenancy act provides for the mechanism to enable the tenants
to become owners of the land they themselves cultivate. They are
entitled to purchase at concessional prices, so much of the land,
as would raise their holding to make it a family holding. At the
same time, landlords also have been protected by ensuring that the
land left with them after such a purchase would not be less than a
family holding. The tenants are allowed to effectd payments in
resonable instalments. In case a tenant desire to purchase more
land than what he is entitled to, he can do so at the market
price, but subject to the maximum of three family holdings. In
order to avoid illegal transfers of land, the government has
prescribed a scale of penalty for transfer after 8.6.1958, that
is, after the commencement of the amended act of 1957.
|