|
 |
BANKING, TRADE AND COMMERCE
|
 |
INSURANCE
Although the beginning of insurance in India was made in 1870 when
some private companies were formed, the real expansion of the
business took place during the time of the swadeshi
movement. For long, however, the life insurance business remained
in the hands of foreign companies. It was only in the wake of
the freedom movement and during the Second World War when
inflationary pressures tended to swell, the volume of business
increased and new companies came up. With a view, therefore, to
keeping a close watch over the management, investments of funds
and expenditure of insurance companies, the Government
established a department of insurance and enacted the Insurance
Act of 1938.
The district suffered from the general economic backwardness of
the Marathwada region during the rule of the ex-State of
Hyderabad. Insurance was practically non-existent till the
establishment of the Life Insurance Corporation of India in 1956,
by a special ordinance which transferred the management and
control of life insurance business in India, including the foreign
business of Indian insurers and the Indian business of foreign
insurers to the Central Government.
Under the new organisational and administrative set-up of the Life
Insurance Corporation, Bhir district is placed under the
territorial jurisdiction of the Poona division of the Western Zone
along with Aurangabad district. The total territory covered by the
branch consists of Aurangabad and Bhir districts. The total number
of insurance agents in the branch was 164 by the close of 1957,
178 by the end of the following year and 309 by the end of 1959.
The following table gives the details about the insurance business
done in Bhir district:—
TABLE No. 10
Insurance Business in Bhir District (from 1-9-56 to
30-4-60)
Period |
Proposed |
Completed |
Number of proposals |
Sum proposed |
Number of policies |
Sum assured |
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
|
|
Rs. |
|
Rs. |
1-9-1956 to 31-12-1956 |
*697 |
22,78,950 |
437 |
Rs.14,54,000 |
Year 1957 |
|
|
|
|
January |
77 |
2,33,500 |
-- |
-- |
February |
118 |
4,40,500 |
106 |
3,52,500 |
March |
167 |
7,09,250 |
139 |
4,29,000 |
April |
170 |
6 96,000 |
39 |
1,71,000 |
May |
288 |
10 84 000 |
152 |
5 73 000 |
June |
212 |
6 27 500 |
93 |
4,25,000 |
July |
194 |
6,74
000 |
161 |
5, 62 000 |
August |
300 |
12,23,000 |
281 |
10 35 500 |
September |
404 |
12,95,000 |
202 |
7,89,000 |
October |
377 |
10,37,000 |
378 |
13,43,500 |
November |
317 |
9 30 000 |
31? |
10,03,500 |
December |
702 |
21,87,000 |
841 |
25,88,200 |
Total for 1957. |
3,326 |
1,11,37,750 |
2,706 |
92,72,200 |
Year 1958* |
|
|
|
|
January |
25 |
46,000 |
1 |
6,000 |
February |
189 |
5,27,000 |
58 |
1,96,000 |
March |
254 |
6,25,500 |
90 |
2,33,000 |
April |
252 |
6,79,250 |
121 |
3,15,500 |
May |
192 |
5,78,500 |
144 |
3,94,500 |
June |
176 |
4,75,550 |
105 |
2,93,500 |
July |
260 |
7,38,500 |
121 |
3,11,500 |
August |
353 |
11,61,525 |
139 |
4,14,500 |
September |
348 |
12,28,475 |
154 |
5,89,500 |
October |
354 |
12,30,500 |
326 |
10,05,000 |
November |
484 |
17,43,000 |
266 |
8,91,500 |
December |
938 |
29,14,000 |
1,333 |
46,40,500 |
Total for 1958 |
3,955 |
1,22,99,700 |
3,013 |
96,83,300 |
Year I959† |
|
|
|
|
January |
196 |
Rs.4,63,250 |
1 |
Rs.11,000 |
February |
161 |
4,88,000 |
-- |
-- |
March |
192 |
5,86,000 |
57 |
1,49,500 |
April |
233 |
7,30,900 |
107 |
3,30,000 |
May |
234 |
6,56,000 |
83 |
2,20,500 |
June |
213 |
5,85,500 |
111 |
3,37,500 |
July |
138 |
4,07,500 |
104 |
2,99,500 |
August |
163 |
5,47,000 |
171 |
5,43,500 |
September |
199 |
6,85,000 |
122 |
5,80,000 |
October |
268 |
9,51,000 |
140 |
4,76,500 |
November |
360 |
11,05,250 |
109 |
2,97,000 |
December |
909 |
31,40,000 |
781 |
29,83,750 |
Total for 1959 |
3,246 |
1,04,02,000 |
2,188 |
73,36,250 |
Year 1960 |
|
|
|
|
January |
37 |
1,29,500 |
6 |
26,000 |
February |
83 |
2,80,500 |
17 |
58,000 |
March |
105 |
3,42,000 |
65 |
2,24,000 |
April |
262 |
8,22,000 |
93 |
3,16,500 |
Total for 1960 for
the period from 1-1-60 to 30-4-60. |
487 |
15,74,000 |
181 |
6,24,500 |
*These figures include business of 2 more
districts, viz., Nanded and Parbhani.
Despite the rapid increase in life insurance
business in the country in recent years, the per capita
insurance in Bhir district is very low and compares very
unfavourably with that of other districts of Maharashtra. The
reasons for this low per capita insurance are the economic
backwardness of the district, high percentage of illiteracy and
the low insurance consciousness among the people.
|